Is there any answer to why Master of Disguise is rated so bad? This article is ready to tell you all the whats and what-nots about the popular movie, including the many reasons why it is rated low on the countdown!
The Master of Disguise is a 2002 American adventure comedy film directed by Perry Andelin Blake in his sole directorial effort, written by Dana Carvey and Harris Goldberg. It tells the story of a man who is trained to become a “Master of Disguise” by his grandfather when a master criminal kidnaps his parents.
The film was initially developed with Jim Carrey in mind to star, but he turned it down, resulting in Sandler colleague Dana Carvey getting cast. There is a longstanding rumor that the filming of the scene in the Turtle Club took place on September 11, 2001, the same day as the September 11 attacks, causing production to stop and observe a moment of silence during the terrorist attacks.
The Master of Disguise was granted a PG certificate by the British Board of Film Classification for mild language and mild comic violence. Given these fine facts and the longstanding repute of the film during its first production in 2002, it is unlikely that it should fall into the ditch of unfriendly criticism across the movie review sites and blogs. So, why Master of Disguise rated so bad after all?
The Reviews of the Movie, Master of Disguise and Why?
Below are the individuals from various news stables that gave their reviews of the film and each of them somewhat rated the film very low. However, the ratings as to why Master of Disguise rated so bad do not agree:
Alan Morrison, writing for Empire, suggested that it was no more than a feeble imitation of the character comedy of the Austin Powers series, concluding that The Master of Disguise was the single worst movie ever made: “a film about idiots, made by idiots, for idiots”.
Peter Bradshaw, writing for The Guardian, awarded the film two stars out of five, citing a limited number of amusing moments, but criticizing Carvey’s characterizations and suggesting to the potential audience member that “you might want to put the shotgun in your mouth”.
Jamie Russell at the BBC described the film as being so bad as to make other movies such as Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo seem like comic equivalents to Citizen Kane: “Never have so many jokes clunked off the screen to such a silent audience. And never has 80 minutes seemed like such an eternity.”
Adam Smith in the Radio Times drew attention to the “lame screenplay” and “barely coherent plot”, and noted that “when the nearest thing to a genuine joke is the bad guy’s propensity for breaking wind whenever he laughs, you can be pretty sure that you’re not in the hands of comedy geniuses”.
Read Also: About Lake Bell Movies and TV Shows
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 1% based on 104 reviews with an average rating of 2.6/10, making it the lowest-rated film produced by Revolution Studios to date. Its consensus reads: “An ill conceived attempt to utilize Dana Carvey’s talent for mimicry, The Master of Disguise is an irritating, witless farce weighted down by sophomoric gags.”
On Metacritic, the film has a score of 12 out of 100 based on reviews from 24 critics, indicating “overwhelming dislike”. Audiences surveyed by CinemaScore gave the film a grade “B−” on scale of A to F.
Roger Ebert, awarding the film a rating of one star out of four, reserved some praise for director Perry Andelin Blake’s production design, as well as for Carvey’s imitative abilities, but saw the overall movie as being “like a party guest who thinks he is funny and is wrong”. Ebert also noted that the film is only 65 minutes long, but includes 15 minutes of credit cookies in order to qualify as a feature presentation.
Copyright Alert: Contents on this website may not be republished, reproduced, redistributed either in whole or in part without due permission or acknowledgement. In the case of re-publication in online platforms, proper acknowledgment include, but not limited to LINK BACK TO THE ARTICLE And proper REFERENCING in research usage. All contents are protected by Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1996 (DMCA).
If you own this content & believe your copyright was violated or infringed, make sure you contact us via This Means to file a complaint & actions will be taken immediately.